Ideas for FUTURE projects
★ Consider the set of all generating operators which do not attain their norms. Is this set dense in the set of all generating operators?
Mirar las diapositivas de Miguel de la Winter School Korea 2024
★ To find (norm-attaining) operators which belong to the subset BŠ(X,Y) and then study its denseness
The same question can be done for its complement. (BŠ stands for the Bhatia-Šemrl property)
★ To find (norm-attaining) operators which belong to the subset BŠ(X,Y) and then study its denseness
The same question can be done for its complement. (BŠ stands for the Bhatia-Šemrl property)
★ To find (norm-attaining) operators which belong to the subset BŠ(X,Y) and then study its denseness
The same question can be done for its complement. (BŠ stands for the Bhatia-Šemrl property)
★ OH for homogeneous polynomials
In the paper by Geunsu, Mingu and Sun Kwang (THE BIRKHOFF-JAMES ORTHOGONALITY AND NORM ATTAINMENT FOR MULTILINEAR MAPS) the consider multilinear maps already. How about polynomials?
★ NA(J), where J stands for the James space
It is not known that when (X,Y) satisfies the BPBp by assuming that X has the Radon-Nikodým property nor what happens with the particular case of James’ space J (this question was to me by ARZ)
★ Does the BPBp imply the BPBp for finite rank operators?
This question was made by RM to me
10. Counterexample for the density of the symmetric tensors
8. NRA(X) contains no 2 dimensional Banach spaces
7. Elements of tensor product space attaining their Chevet-Saphar norms
3. Daugavet points in the homogenous polynomials spaces
1. Phi-properties
↓↓↓ IDEAS FOR THE FUTURE ↓↓↓
w- and w^*-denseness of norm-attaining
Randon-Nikodým property and functions that attain their weighted norms
Strong Subdifferentiability
Daugavet and delta points
Lineability
Lipschitz-free spaces
Renorming
Daugavet property
Norm-attaining theory